How to Solve Flaky Tests in Katalon Studio (The Real Way)

August 5, 2025

The CI/CD pipeline glows green, then red, then green again—with no code changes. This familiar, frustrating rhythm is the tell-tale sign of a problem that plagues even the most seasoned QA teams: flaky tests. A single flaky test can erode trust in your entire automation suite, delay releases, and waste countless developer hours on fruitless investigations. While it's tempting to blame the tool, the root of Katalon flaky tests often lies deeper, in the strategy and structure of the tests themselves. This guide moves beyond simplistic fixes like adding arbitrary delays. We will explore a systematic approach to detect, diagnose, and definitively solve test flakiness in Katalon Studio, empowering you to build a resilient, reliable, and trustworthy automation framework that accelerates, rather than hinders, your development lifecycle. According to a recent industry report, flaky tests are a top challenge for over 60% of QA teams, making this a critical skill to master.

Understanding the True Cost of Katalon Flaky Tests

Before diving into solutions, it's crucial to understand why eliminating Katalon flaky tests is not just a technical task but a business imperative. A flaky test is defined as a test that can both pass and fail on the same code without any changes. This unpredictability is its most dangerous trait.

Unlike a consistently failing test, which clearly signals a bug in the application or the test script, a flaky test introduces uncertainty. It creates a 'boy who cried wolf' scenario. When a test fails, the team must ask: "Is this a real bug, or just the test being flaky again?" This hesitation has cascading consequences:

  • Erosion of Trust: Developers and product managers begin to lose confidence in the test suite. If the tests are unreliable, they stop being a trusted quality gate. This can lead to teams ignoring failures, defeating the entire purpose of automation, as noted in analysis by software architect Martin Fowler.
  • Decreased Velocity: Every flaky failure triggers an investigation. Teams spend valuable time re-running builds, analyzing logs, and debugging the test instead of developing new features or fixing known issues. A Google engineering study found that a significant portion of their compute resources were spent re-running flaky tests.
  • Masking of Real Regressions: A flaky test that randomly passes can conceal a genuine regression. A critical bug might slip into production because the corresponding test happened to pass on that specific run, leading to costly post-release fixes.
  • Team Morale: Constantly battling an unpredictable test suite is demoralizing. It leads to frustration and burnout, turning automation from a powerful engineering tool into a source of constant annoyance.

In essence, Katalon flaky tests are a tax on your development process. They tax your time, your confidence, and your release cadence. Solving them isn't about tidying up your test suite; it's about reclaiming efficiency and ensuring your automation efforts deliver on their core promise: providing fast, reliable feedback.

Step 1: Systematically Detecting Flakiness in Your Katalon Suite

You can't fix what you can't find. The first step in eradicating flakiness is to systematically identify which tests are unreliable. Relying on anecdotal evidence ("I think the login test is flaky") is inefficient. A data-driven approach is essential.

Leveraging Katalon TestOps for Flakiness Analysis

Katalon TestOps is a powerful, often underutilized, tool in the fight against flaky tests. It provides built-in analytics designed to spotlight instability. By integrating your Katalon Studio projects with TestOps, you gain access to dashboards that automatically track test execution history. TestOps identifies a test as 'flaky' when it observes alternating pass/fail statuses over a series of runs against the same application build. It provides reports on the flakiness rate of individual tests and entire test suites, allowing you to prioritize the most problematic ones. This feature turns detection from a manual chore into an automated process, a key recommendation in DevOps toolchain best practices.

The Strategic Use of Retries

Implementing a retry mechanism is another effective detection strategy. While automatically re-running a failed test in a CI/CD pipeline can be a temporary solution to push a build through, its primary value is as a diagnostic tool.

Katalon Studio has a built-in feature, Retry Failed Executions, which you can configure in your test suite settings. Set it to retry a failed test 1 or 2 times. After a few weeks, analyze the results:

  • Tests that consistently fail on the first run but pass on retry are prime candidates for flakiness. The retry's success indicates the issue is likely timing-related or due to a brief environmental hiccup, not a hard bug.
  • Tests that fail all retries are more likely pointing to a legitimate application bug or a fundamentally broken test script.

This data is invaluable. You can create a dashboard or report that flags any test case requiring a retry to pass. This is your high-priority list for investigation. Many CI/CD platforms like GitLab CI or Jenkins also offer retry logic that can be used to gather this data at the pipeline level.

Manual Log and Report Analysis

For teams without TestOps, manual analysis is still a viable option. Regularly review your Test Suite Collection reports. Look for patterns:

  • Does a specific test fail intermittently in the nightly run?
  • Does a test fail only when run as part of a large suite but pass when run individually?
  • Are failures concentrated around specific times of day, which might indicate environmental load?

This manual process is more labor-intensive but forces a deep familiarity with your test suite's behavior. Document your findings in a shared spreadsheet or a bug tracking tool to build a historical record of flakiness.

Step 2: Diagnosing the Root Causes of Flaky Tests

Once you've identified a flaky test, the next step is to diagnose the underlying cause. Simply adding a WebUI.delay(5) is a code smell and a temporary patch, not a solution. True resilience comes from understanding why the test is failing intermittently. Here are the most common culprits for Katalon flaky tests.

1. Asynchronous Operations and Timing Issues

This is, by far, the most frequent cause of flakiness in modern web applications. Web pages are not static documents; they are dynamic ecosystems of JavaScript, API calls (XHR/Fetch), and animations that operate asynchronously. Your test script executes commands sequentially, but the browser does not. A test fails because it tries to interact with an element that hasn't appeared, become interactive, or finished animating yet.

Symptoms: ElementNotFoundException, ElementNotInteractableException, StaleElementReferenceException.

2. Test Data Dependencies and State Pollution

Tests should be atomic and independent. A flaky test often relies on a specific state in the application that is not guaranteed. For example:

  • Test A creates a user '[email protected]'.
  • Test B also tries to create the same user and fails if Test A didn't clean up after itself.
  • Test C tries to delete the user, but fails if Test A or B failed to create it in the first place.

When these tests are run in a different order or in parallel, they fail unpredictably. This is known as state pollution, where one test leaves the application in a state that causes another test to fail. The principle of test isolation is a cornerstone of reliable automation, as detailed in test automation framework design principles.

3. Environment and Infrastructure Instability

Your tests don't run in a vacuum. They rely on a network, a server, a database, and potentially dozens of third-party services. Any instability in this chain can cause a test to fail.

  • Network Latency: A sudden spike in network delay can cause an element to load slower than your test's implicit wait time.
  • API Rate Limiting: A third-party service might temporarily block requests if your tests are too aggressive.
  • Database Load: A database under heavy load during a nightly build might respond slowly, causing timeouts.
  • Inconsistent Test Environments: The test might pass on a developer's machine but fail in the CI/CD environment due to differences in configuration, operating system, or browser version. The rise of containerization with Docker is a direct response to this problem of environmental inconsistency, a concept Red Hat describes as crucial for modern DevTest environments.

4. Non-Deterministic Application Behavior

Sometimes, the flakiness comes from the application itself. Modern apps often include elements that are intentionally non-deterministic:

  • A/B Testing Frameworks: The application might show different versions of a page or element to different users, causing your locator to fail.
  • Feature Flags: A feature might be enabled or disabled, changing the UI and breaking tests.
  • Random Pop-ups or Surveys: An unexpected modal for a user survey or a GDPR consent form can intercept a click and derail a test.
  • Slow-loading Ads: Third-party ad scripts can significantly alter page layout and timing, causing elements to shift or become obscured.

Step 3: The Real Way to Solve Flaky Tests - Strategic Solutions

Solving Katalon flaky tests requires a strategic, multi-faceted approach. It's about writing smarter, more resilient tests, not just faster ones. Here are the definitive techniques to build a stable Katalon test suite.

Master Intelligent Wait Strategies

This is the single most important skill for fixing flakiness. Stop using WebUI.delay() (static waits). A static wait pauses the test for a fixed duration, regardless of the application's state. If the element appears early, you've wasted time. If it appears late, the test fails. Instead, use intelligent, conditional waits.

Explicit Waits: These instruct the test to wait for a specific condition to be met before proceeding, up to a maximum timeout. They are the bedrock of reliable tests.

  • WebUI.waitForElementVisible(findTestObject('...'), 10): Waits up to 10 seconds for the element to be present in the DOM and visible.
  • WebUI.waitForElementClickable(findTestObject('...'), 10): Waits for the element to be visible and enabled, ensuring it can be clicked.
  • WebUI.waitForJQueryActive(): Essential for apps using jQuery, this waits for all AJAX requests to complete.

Incorrect (Flaky) Way:

WebUI.click(findTestObject('Page_Checkout/btn_SubmitOrder'))
WebUI.delay(5) // Hope the confirmation appears in 5 seconds
WebUI.verifyElementPresent(findTestObject('Page_Confirmation/h1_ThankYou'), 10)

Correct (Reliable) Way:

WebUI.click(findTestObject('Page_Checkout/btn_SubmitOrder'))
// Wait intelligently for the result of the action
WebUI.waitForElementVisible(findTestObject('Page_Confirmation/h1_ThankYou'), 15) 
WebUI.verifyElementPresent(findTestObject('Page_Confirmation/h1_ThankYou'), 10)

For highly complex scenarios, you can create Fluent Waits using Selenium's underlying libraries within Katalon. This allows you to define custom polling intervals and ignore specific exceptions during the wait, providing maximum control. A guide on this advanced technique can be found in the official Selenium documentation.

Build Atomic and Independent Tests with Proper Setup/Teardown

Every test case should be a self-contained unit. It must be able to run independently and in any order without affecting other tests. This is achieved using the Arrange-Act-Assert (AAA) pattern and Katalon's Test Listeners.

  • @BeforeTestCase (Arrange): Use this annotation in a Test Listener to set up the precise conditions your test needs. This could involve making an API call to create a specific user, inserting data into a database, or navigating to a starting URL.
  • Test Case Body (Act & Assert): The test itself should perform the user action and then verify the outcome.
  • @AfterTestCase (Teardown/Cleanup): This is critical. After the test runs (whether it passes or fails), use this listener to clean up. Delete the user created, reset the database state, or log out of the application. This ensures the next test starts with a clean slate.

Example setUp and tearDown logic in a Test Listener:

import com.kms.katalon.core.annotation.AfterTestCase
import com.kms.katalon.core.annotation.BeforeTestCase
import com.kms.katalon.core.context.TestCaseContext

class CommonTestListener {
    @BeforeTestCase
    void setup(TestCaseContext testCaseContext) {
        // Example: Use an API to ensure a test user exists
        println "Setting up data for: " + testCaseContext.getTestCaseId()
        // APIService.createUser('testuser123', 'password')
    }

    @AfterTestCase
    void teardown(TestCaseContext testCaseContext) {
        // Example: Use an API to delete the test user, ensuring idempotency
        println "Tearing down data for: " + testCaseContext.getTestCaseId()
        // APIService.deleteUser('testuser123')
    }
}

This practice of programmatic data setup and teardown is a key tenet of modern test data management strategies.

Implement Robust Test Data Management

Hardcoding data like usernames or product names into tests is a recipe for flakiness. If that data changes in the application, your test breaks. Katalon provides several ways to externalize test data:

  • Data Files: Use Excel, CSV, or Internal Data files to bind your test cases to different data sets. This is ideal for data-driven testing (e.g., testing the login with 10 different user profiles).
  • Programmatic Data Creation: For truly isolated tests, the best approach is to create the data you need on-the-fly via API calls or direct database interaction within your @BeforeTestCase setup, as shown above. This decouples your tests from any pre-existing state in the test environment.

Utilize Katalon's Self-Healing (With Caution)

Katalon's Self-Healing feature can be a useful safety net. When a test fails to find an object using its primary locator, Self-Healing attempts to find it using other stored locators (e.g., XPath, attributes, CSS). If it finds the element, the test continues, and the broken locator is flagged for review.

However, it's crucial to view Self-Healing as a diagnostic tool, not a permanent fix. It alerts you that your locators are brittle. The correct response is to go back and create a more robust, unique locator (e.g., a dedicated data-testid attribute), not to rely on Self-Healing indefinitely. Over-reliance can mask underlying application changes and lead to slower, less maintainable tests. According to a TechBeacon report on automation pitfalls, brittle locators are a leading cause of maintenance overhead.

Conquering Katalon flaky tests is a journey from reactive patching to proactive, resilient design. It requires a shift in mindset: from simply writing scripts that work sometimes to engineering automated tests that are as robust and reliable as the production code they validate. By adopting a systematic process of detection with tools like TestOps, performing diligent root cause analysis, and implementing strategic solutions—especially intelligent waits and atomic test design—you transform your automation suite from a source of friction into a true asset. A stable test suite builds confidence, accelerates feedback loops, and ultimately empowers your team to deliver higher-quality software, faster. Stop chasing ghosts in your CI/CD pipeline and start building the stable, trustworthy automation framework your team deserves.

What today's top teams are saying about Momentic:

"Momentic makes it 3x faster for our team to write and maintain end to end tests."

- Alex, CTO, GPTZero

"Works for us in prod, super great UX, and incredible velocity and delivery."

- Aditya, CTO, Best Parents

"…it was done running in 14 min, without me needing to do a thing during that time."

- Mike, Eng Manager, Runway

Increase velocity with reliable AI testing.

Run stable, dev-owned tests on every push. No QA bottlenecks.

Ship it

FAQs

Momentic tests are much more reliable than Playwright or Cypress tests because they are not affected by changes in the DOM.

Our customers often build their first tests within five minutes. It's very easy to build tests using the low-code editor. You can also record your actions and turn them into a fully working automated test.

Not even a little bit. As long as you can clearly describe what you want to test, Momentic can get it done.

Yes. You can use Momentic's CLI to run tests anywhere. We support any CI provider that can run Node.js.

Mobile and desktop support is on our roadmap, but we don't have a specific release date yet.

We currently support Chromium and Chrome browsers for tests. Safari and Firefox support is on our roadmap, but we don't have a specific release date yet.

© 2025 Momentic, Inc.
All rights reserved.